From email chaos to structured project tracking
The situation
A five-person architecture studio in Prague was managing twelve active client projects simultaneously. Every project had its own email thread, shared drive folder, and informal WhatsApp group. When a client asked for an update, the principal architect had to search across three systems to piece together a current picture.
New team members took weeks to get oriented. Document versions were a persistent problem. The studio was growing but the operational structure was not keeping pace.
What we did
We started with a two-day audit, interviewing each team member about how they currently tracked their work. We mapped the full project lifecycle from client brief to final delivery and identified eight distinct friction points.
We designed a project board structure in a tool the team already had access to but had never configured properly. Each project phase became a column. Each deliverable became a card with an owner and a due date. Client communication was routed through a single shared inbox linked to the project board.
We also redesigned the shared drive architecture. Every project folder followed the same structure. Naming conventions were documented in a one-page reference guide pinned to the drive.
The outcome
Within four weeks the team was using the system consistently. The principal architect reported spending significantly less time on status updates. New projects were onboarded into the structure from day one. The studio went on to hire a sixth team member who was operational within their first week.